Catalònica: Aggregator of digital content of Catalunya > Log data

It's in  › Log data

Linked Open Data

A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial»

Resource identifiers

http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400

Origin

(DUGiDocs. Publicacions)

File

Title:: A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial»
Subject:: Justícia; Justice; Procediment judicial; Judicial process; Procediment penal; Criminal procedure; Equitat (Dret; Equity
Description:: This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves; 10; 16
Origin:: QF, vol. 07 (2024), p. 173-185; QF, núm. 07 (2024)
Idioma:: English
Relationship:: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2660-4515; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2604-6202
Author/Producer:: Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B.
Editor:: Universitat de Girona Marcial Pons
Rights:: Attribution 4.0 International; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Date:: 2024
Resource type:: info:eu-repo/semantics/article; info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion; peer-reviewed
Format:: application/pdf

oai_dc

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< oai_dc:dc schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd " >
1. < dc:title > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ dc:title >
2. < dc:creator > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ dc:creator >
3. < dc:subject > Justícia </ dc:subject >
4. < dc:subject > Justice </ dc:subject >
5. < dc:subject > Procediment judicial </ dc:subject >
6. < dc:subject > Judicial process </ dc:subject >
7. < dc:subject > Procediment penal </ dc:subject >
8. < dc:subject > Criminal procedure </ dc:subject >
9. < dc:subject > Equitat (Dret </ dc:subject >
10. < dc:subject > Equity </ dc:subject >
11. < dc:description > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ dc:description >
12. < dc:description > 10 </ dc:description >
13. < dc:description > 16 </ dc:description >
14. < dc:date > 2024 </ dc:date >
15. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
16. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ dc:type >
17. < dc:type > peer-reviewed </ dc:type >
18. < dc:identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ dc:identifier >
19. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ dc:relation >
20. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2660-4515 </ dc:relation >
21. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2604-6202 </ dc:relation >
22. < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >
23. < dc:source > QF, vol. 07 (2024), p. 173-185 </ dc:source >
24. < dc:source > QF, núm. 07 (2024) </ dc:source >
25. < dc:rights > Attribution 4.0 International </ dc:rights >
26. < dc:rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ </ dc:rights >
27. < dc:rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dc:rights >
28. < dc:format > application/pdf </ dc:format >
29. < dc:publisher > Universitat de Girona Marcial Pons </ dc:publisher >
</ oai_dc:dc >

didl

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< d:DIDL schemaLocation =" urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd " >
1. < d:DIDLInfo >
  1. < dcterms:created schemaLocation =" http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd " > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ dcterms:created >
  </ d:DIDLInfo >
2. < d:Item id =" hdl_10256_26400 " >
  1. < d:Descriptor >
    1. < d:Statement mimeType =" application/xml; charset=utf-8 " >
      1. < dii:Identifier schemaLocation =" urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd " > urn:hdl:10256/26400 </ dii:Identifier >
      </ d:Statement >
    </ d:Descriptor >
  2. < d:Descriptor >
    1. < d:Statement mimeType =" application/xml; charset=utf-8 " >
      1. < oai_dc:dc schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd " >
        
        < dc:title > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ dc:title >
        
        < dc:creator > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ dc:creator >
        
        < dc:subject > Justícia </ dc:subject >
        
        < dc:subject > Justice </ dc:subject >
        
        < dc:subject > Procediment judicial </ dc:subject >
        
        < dc:subject > Judicial process </ dc:subject >
        
        < dc:subject > Procediment penal </ dc:subject >
        
        < dc:subject > Criminal procedure </ dc:subject >
        
        < dc:subject > Equitat (Dret </ dc:subject >
        
        < dc:subject > Equity </ dc:subject >
        
        < dc:description > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ dc:description >
        
        < dc:date > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ dc:date >
        
        < dc:date > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ dc:date >
        
        < dc:date > 2024 </ dc:date >
        
        < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
        
        < dc:identifier > 2660-4515 </ dc:identifier >
        
        < dc:identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ dc:identifier >
        
        < dc:identifier > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ dc:identifier >
        
        < dc:identifier > 2604-6202 </ dc:identifier >
        
        < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >
        
        < dc:relation > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ dc:relation >
        
        < dc:relation > QF, vol. 07 (2024), p. 173-185 </ dc:relation >
        
        < dc:relation > QF, núm. 07 (2024) </ dc:relation >
        
        < dc:rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ </ dc:rights >
        
        < dc:rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dc:rights >
        
        < dc:rights > Attribution 4.0 International </ dc:rights >
        
        < dc:publisher > Universitat de Girona Marcial Pons </ dc:publisher >
        
        </ oai_dc:dc >
      </ d:Statement >
    </ d:Descriptor >
  3. < d:Component id =" 10256_26400_1 " >
    1. < d:Resource mimeType =" application/pdf " ref =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/1/Gonzales+Rose_QF+7_2024.pdf " />
    </ d:Component >
  </ d:Item >
</ d:DIDL >

dim

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< dim:dim schemaLocation =" http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd " >
1. < dim:field element =" contributor " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" author " > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ dim:field >
2. < dim:field element =" date " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" accessioned " > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ dim:field >
3. < dim:field element =" date " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" available " > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ dim:field >
4. < dim:field element =" date " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" issued " > 2024 </ dim:field >
5. < dim:field element =" identifier " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" issn " > 2660-4515 </ dim:field >
6. < dim:field element =" identifier " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" uri " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ dim:field >
7. < dim:field element =" identifier " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" doi " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ dim:field >
8. < dim:field element =" identifier " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" eissn " > 2604-6202 </ dim:field >
9. < dim:field element =" description " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" abstract " > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ dim:field >
10. < dim:field element =" description " lang =" en " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" provenance " > Submitted by Alfredo Cobo (fredy.cobo@udg.edu) on 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 908 bytes, checksum: 0175ea4a2d4caec4bbcc37e300941108 (MD5) Gonzales Rose_QF 7_2024.pdf: 621940 bytes, checksum: 996e7c520aee9f542f85b5fdff1d518c (MD5) </ dim:field >
11. < dim:field element =" description " lang =" en " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" provenance " > Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 908 bytes, checksum: 0175ea4a2d4caec4bbcc37e300941108 (MD5) Gonzales Rose_QF 7_2024.pdf: 621940 bytes, checksum: 996e7c520aee9f542f85b5fdff1d518c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2024 </ dim:field >
12. < dim:field element =" description " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" ods " > 10 </ dim:field >
13. < dim:field element =" description " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" ods " > 16 </ dim:field >
14. < dim:field element =" format " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" mimetype " > application/pdf </ dim:field >
15. < dim:field element =" language " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" iso " > eng </ dim:field >
16. < dim:field element =" publisher " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > Universitat de Girona Marcial Pons </ dim:field >
17. < dim:field element =" relation " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" isformatof " > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ dim:field >
18. < dim:field element =" relation " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" ispartof " > QF, vol. 07 (2024), p. 173-185 </ dim:field >
19. < dim:field element =" relation " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" ispartofseries " > QF, núm. 07 (2024) </ dim:field >
20. < dim:field element =" rights " lang =" * " mdschema =" dc " > Attribution 4.0 International </ dim:field >
21. < dim:field element =" rights " lang =" * " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" uri " > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ </ dim:field >
22. < dim:field element =" rights " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" accessRights " > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dim:field >
23. < dim:field element =" subject " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > Justícia </ dim:field >
24. < dim:field element =" subject " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > Justice </ dim:field >
25. < dim:field element =" subject " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > Procediment judicial </ dim:field >
26. < dim:field element =" subject " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > Judicial process </ dim:field >
27. < dim:field element =" subject " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > Procediment penal </ dim:field >
28. < dim:field element =" subject " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > Criminal procedure </ dim:field >
29. < dim:field element =" subject " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > Equitat (Dret </ dim:field >
30. < dim:field element =" subject " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > Equity </ dim:field >
31. < dim:field element =" title " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ dim:field >
32. < dim:field element =" type " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dim:field >
33. < dim:field element =" type " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" version " > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ dim:field >
34. < dim:field element =" type " lang =" cat " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" peerreviewed " > peer-reviewed </ dim:field >
</ dim:dim >

edm

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< rdf:RDF schemaLocation =" http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/EDM.xsd " >
1. < edm:ProvidedCHO about =" https://catalonica.bnc.cat/catalonicahub/lod/oai:dugi-doc.udg.edu:10256_--_26400#ent0 " >
  1. < dc:creator > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ dc:creator >
  2. < dc:date > 2024 </ dc:date >
  3. < dc:description > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ dc:description >
  4. < dc:description > 10 </ dc:description >
  5. < dc:description > 16 </ dc:description >
  6. < dc:identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ dc:identifier >
  7. < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >
  8. < dc:publisher > Universitat de Girona Marcial Pons </ dc:publisher >
  9. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ dc:relation >
  10. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2660-4515 </ dc:relation >
  11. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2604-6202 </ dc:relation >
  12. < dc:rights > Attribution 4.0 International </ dc:rights >
  13. < dc:rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ </ dc:rights >
  14. < dc:rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dc:rights >
  15. < dc:source > QF, vol. 07 (2024), p. 173-185 </ dc:source >
  16. < dc:source > QF, núm. 07 (2024) </ dc:source >
  17. < dc:subject > Justícia </ dc:subject >
  18. < dc:subject > Justice </ dc:subject >
  19. < dc:subject > Procediment judicial </ dc:subject >
  20. < dc:subject > Judicial process </ dc:subject >
  21. < dc:subject > Procediment penal </ dc:subject >
  22. < dc:subject > Criminal procedure </ dc:subject >
  23. < dc:subject > Equitat (Dret </ dc:subject >
  24. < dc:subject > Equity </ dc:subject >
  25. < dc:title > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ dc:title >
  26. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
  27. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ dc:type >
  28. < dc:type > peer-reviewed </ dc:type >
  29. < edm:type > TEXT </ edm:type >
  </ edm:ProvidedCHO >
2. < ore:Aggregation about =" https://catalonica.bnc.cat/catalonicahub/lod/oai:dugi-doc.udg.edu:10256_--_26400#ent1 " >
  1. < edm:aggregatedCHO resource =" https://catalonica.bnc.cat/catalonicahub/lod/oai:dugi-doc.udg.edu:10256_--_26400#ent0 " />
  2. < edm:dataProvider > DUGiDocs. Publicacions </ edm:dataProvider >
  3. < edm:isShownAt resource =" http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 " />
  4. < edm:isShownBy resource =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/1/Gonzales+Rose_QF+7_2024.pdf " />
  5. < edm:provider > Catalònica </ edm:provider >
  6. < edm:rights resource =" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ " />
  </ ore:Aggregation >
</ rdf:RDF >

etdms

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< thesis schemaLocation =" http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd " >
1. < title > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ title >
2. < creator > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ creator >
3. < subject > Justícia </ subject >
4. < subject > Justice </ subject >
5. < subject > Procediment judicial </ subject >
6. < subject > Judicial process </ subject >
7. < subject > Procediment penal </ subject >
8. < subject > Criminal procedure </ subject >
9. < subject > Equitat (Dret </ subject >
10. < subject > Equity </ subject >
11. < description > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ description >
12. < date > 2025-02-13 </ date >
13. < date > 2025-02-13 </ date >
14. < date > 2024 </ date >
15. < type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ type >
16. < identifier > 2660-4515 </ identifier >
17. < identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ identifier >
18. < identifier > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ identifier >
19. < identifier > 2604-6202 </ identifier >
20. < language > eng </ language >
21. < relation > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ relation >
22. < relation > QF, vol. 07 (2024), p. 173-185 </ relation >
23. < relation > QF, núm. 07 (2024) </ relation >
24. < rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ </ rights >
25. < rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ rights >
26. < rights > Attribution 4.0 International </ rights >
27. < publisher > Universitat de Girona Marcial Pons </ publisher >
</ thesis >

marc

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< record schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd " >
1. < leader > 00925njm 22002777a 4500 </ leader >
2. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 042 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > dc </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
3. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ subfield >
  2. < subfield code =" e " > author </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
4. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 260 " >
  1. < subfield code =" c " > 2024 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
5. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 520 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
6. < datafield ind1 =" 8 " ind2 =" " tag =" 024 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > 2660-4515 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
7. < datafield ind1 =" 8 " ind2 =" " tag =" 024 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
8. < datafield ind1 =" 8 " ind2 =" " tag =" 024 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
9. < datafield ind1 =" 8 " ind2 =" " tag =" 024 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > 2604-6202 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
10. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 653 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Justícia </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
11. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 653 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Justice </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
12. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 653 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Procediment judicial </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
13. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 653 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Judicial process </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
14. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 653 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Procediment penal </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
15. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 653 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Criminal procedure </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
16. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 653 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Equitat (Dret </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
17. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 653 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Equity </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
18. < datafield ind1 =" 0 " ind2 =" 0 " tag =" 245 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
</ record >

mets

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< mets ID =" DSpace_ITEM_10256-26400 " OBJID =" hdl:10256/26400 " PROFILE =" DSpace METS SIP Profile 1.0 " TYPE =" DSpace ITEM " schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd " >
1. < metsHdr CREATEDATE =" 2025-02-15T00:31:07Z " >
  1. < agent ROLE =" CUSTODIAN " TYPE =" ORGANIZATION " >
    1. < name > DUGiDocs </ name >
    </ agent >
  </ metsHdr >
2. < dmdSec ID =" DMD_10256_26400 " >
  1. < mdWrap MDTYPE =" MODS " >
    1. < xmlData schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd " >
      1. < mods:mods schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd " >
        
        < mods:name >
        
        < mods:role >
        
        < mods:roleTerm type =" text " > author </ mods:roleTerm >
        
        </ mods:role >
        
        < mods:namePart > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ mods:namePart >
        
        </ mods:name >
        
        < mods:extension >
        
        < mods:dateAccessioned encoding =" iso8601 " > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ mods:dateAccessioned >
        
        </ mods:extension >
        
        < mods:extension >
        
        < mods:dateAvailable encoding =" iso8601 " > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ mods:dateAvailable >
        
        </ mods:extension >
        
        < mods:originInfo >
        
        < mods:dateIssued encoding =" iso8601 " > 2024 </ mods:dateIssued >
        
        </ mods:originInfo >
        
        < mods:identifier type =" issn " > 2660-4515 </ mods:identifier >
        
        < mods:identifier type =" uri " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ mods:identifier >
        
        < mods:identifier type =" doi " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ mods:identifier >
        
        < mods:identifier type =" eissn " > 2604-6202 </ mods:identifier >
        
        < mods:abstract > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ mods:abstract >
        
        < mods:language >
        
        < mods:languageTerm authority =" rfc3066 " > eng </ mods:languageTerm >
        
        </ mods:language >
        
        < mods:accessCondition type =" useAndReproduction " > Attribution 4.0 International </ mods:accessCondition >
        
        < mods:subject >
        
        < mods:topic > Justícia </ mods:topic >
        
        </ mods:subject >
        
        < mods:subject >
        
        < mods:topic > Justice </ mods:topic >
        
        </ mods:subject >
        
        < mods:subject >
        
        < mods:topic > Procediment judicial </ mods:topic >
        
        </ mods:subject >
        
        < mods:subject >
        
        < mods:topic > Judicial process </ mods:topic >
        
        </ mods:subject >
        
        < mods:subject >
        
        < mods:topic > Procediment penal </ mods:topic >
        
        </ mods:subject >
        
        < mods:subject >
        
        < mods:topic > Criminal procedure </ mods:topic >
        
        </ mods:subject >
        
        < mods:subject >
        
        < mods:topic > Equitat (Dret </ mods:topic >
        
        </ mods:subject >
        
        < mods:subject >
        
        < mods:topic > Equity </ mods:topic >
        
        </ mods:subject >
        
        < mods:titleInfo >
        
        < mods:title > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ mods:title >
        
        </ mods:titleInfo >
        
        < mods:genre > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ mods:genre >
        
        </ mods:mods >
      </ xmlData >
    </ mdWrap >
  </ dmdSec >
3. < amdSec ID =" TMD_10256_26400 " >
  1. < rightsMD ID =" RIG_10256_26400 " >
    1. < mdWrap MDTYPE =" OTHER " MIMETYPE =" text/plain " OTHERMDTYPE =" DSpaceDepositLicense " >
      1. < binData > 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 </ binData >
      </ mdWrap >
    </ rightsMD >
  </ amdSec >
4. < amdSec ID =" FO_10256_26400_1 " >
  1. < techMD ID =" TECH_O_10256_26400_1 " >
    1. < mdWrap MDTYPE =" PREMIS " >
      1. < xmlData schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/PREMIS-v1-0.xsd " >
        
        < premis:premis >
        
        < premis:object >
        
        < premis:objectIdentifier >
        
        < premis:objectIdentifierType > URL </ premis:objectIdentifierType >
        
        < premis:objectIdentifierValue > https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/1/Gonzales+Rose_QF+7_2024.pdf </ premis:objectIdentifierValue >
        
        </ premis:objectIdentifier >
        
        < premis:objectCategory > File </ premis:objectCategory >
        
        < premis:objectCharacteristics >
        
        < premis:fixity >
        
        < premis:messageDigestAlgorithm > MD5 </ premis:messageDigestAlgorithm >
        
        < premis:messageDigest > 996e7c520aee9f542f85b5fdff1d518c </ premis:messageDigest >
        
        </ premis:fixity >
        
        < premis:size > 621940 </ premis:size >
        
        < premis:format >
        
        < premis:formatDesignation >
        
        < premis:formatName > application/pdf </ premis:formatName >
        
        </ premis:formatDesignation >
        
        </ premis:format >
        
        </ premis:objectCharacteristics >
        
        < premis:originalName > Gonzales Rose_QF 7_2024.pdf </ premis:originalName >
        
        </ premis:object >
        
        </ premis:premis >
        
        </ xmlData >
      </ mdWrap >
    </ techMD >
  </ amdSec >
5. < fileSec >
  1. < fileGrp USE =" ORIGINAL " >
    1. < file ADMID =" FO_10256_26400_1 " CHECKSUM =" 996e7c520aee9f542f85b5fdff1d518c " CHECKSUMTYPE =" MD5 " GROUPID =" GROUP_BITSTREAM_10256_26400_1 " ID =" BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_10256_26400_1 " MIMETYPE =" application/pdf " SEQ =" 1 " SIZE =" 621940 " >
      1. < FLocat LOCTYPE =" URL " href =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/1/Gonzales+Rose_QF+7_2024.pdf " type =" simple " />
      </ file >
    </ fileGrp >
  </ fileSec >
6. < structMap LABEL =" DSpace Object " TYPE =" LOGICAL " >
  1. < div ADMID =" DMD_10256_26400 " TYPE =" DSpace Object Contents " >
    1. < div TYPE =" DSpace BITSTREAM " >
      1. < fptr FILEID =" BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_10256_26400_1 " />
      </ div >
    </ div >
  </ structMap >
</ mets >

mods

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< mods:mods schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd " >
1. < mods:name >
  1. < mods:namePart > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ mods:namePart >
  </ mods:name >
2. < mods:extension >
  1. < mods:dateAvailable encoding =" iso8601 " > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ mods:dateAvailable >
  </ mods:extension >
3. < mods:extension >
  1. < mods:dateAccessioned encoding =" iso8601 " > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ mods:dateAccessioned >
  </ mods:extension >
4. < mods:originInfo >
  1. < mods:dateIssued encoding =" iso8601 " > 2024 </ mods:dateIssued >
  </ mods:originInfo >
5. < mods:identifier type =" issn " > 2660-4515 </ mods:identifier >
6. < mods:identifier type =" uri " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ mods:identifier >
7. < mods:identifier type =" doi " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ mods:identifier >
8. < mods:identifier type =" eissn " > 2604-6202 </ mods:identifier >
9. < mods:abstract > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ mods:abstract >
10. < mods:language >
  1. < mods:languageTerm > eng </ mods:languageTerm >
  </ mods:language >
11. < mods:accessCondition type =" useAndReproduction " > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ </ mods:accessCondition >
12. < mods:accessCondition type =" useAndReproduction " > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ mods:accessCondition >
13. < mods:accessCondition type =" useAndReproduction " > Attribution 4.0 International </ mods:accessCondition >
14. < mods:subject >
  1. < mods:topic > Justícia </ mods:topic >
  </ mods:subject >
15. < mods:subject >
  1. < mods:topic > Justice </ mods:topic >
  </ mods:subject >
16. < mods:subject >
  1. < mods:topic > Procediment judicial </ mods:topic >
  </ mods:subject >
17. < mods:subject >
  1. < mods:topic > Judicial process </ mods:topic >
  </ mods:subject >
18. < mods:subject >
  1. < mods:topic > Procediment penal </ mods:topic >
  </ mods:subject >
19. < mods:subject >
  1. < mods:topic > Criminal procedure </ mods:topic >
  </ mods:subject >
20. < mods:subject >
  1. < mods:topic > Equitat (Dret </ mods:topic >
  </ mods:subject >
21. < mods:subject >
  1. < mods:topic > Equity </ mods:topic >
  </ mods:subject >
22. < mods:titleInfo >
  1. < mods:title > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ mods:title >
  </ mods:titleInfo >
23. < mods:genre > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ mods:genre >
</ mods:mods >

oai_datacite

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< datacite:resource schemaLocation =" http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4-2/metadata.xsd " >
1. < datacite:identifier identifierType =" Handle " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ datacite:identifier >
2. < datacite:titles >
  1. < datacite:title > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ datacite:title >
  </ datacite:titles >
3. < datacite:creators >
  1. < datacite:creator >
    1. < datacite:creatorName > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ datacite:creatorName >
    </ datacite:creator >
  </ datacite:creators >
4. < datacite:contributors />
5. < datacite:subjects >
  1. < datacite:subject > Justícia </ datacite:subject >
  2. < datacite:subject > Justice </ datacite:subject >
  3. < datacite:subject > Procediment judicial </ datacite:subject >
  4. < datacite:subject > Judicial process </ datacite:subject >
  5. < datacite:subject > Procediment penal </ datacite:subject >
  6. < datacite:subject > Criminal procedure </ datacite:subject >
  7. < datacite:subject > Equitat (Dret </ datacite:subject >
  8. < datacite:subject > Equity </ datacite:subject >
  </ datacite:subjects >
6. < datacite:descriptions >
  1. < datacite:description descriptionType =" Abstract " > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ datacite:description >
  </ datacite:descriptions >
7. < datacite:dates >
  1. < datacite:date dateType =" Issued " > 2024 </ datacite:date >
  </ datacite:dates >
8. < datacite:publicationYear > 2024 </ datacite:publicationYear >
9. < datacite:resourceType resourceTypeGeneral =" Dataset " />
10. < datacite:languages >
  1. < datacite:language > eng </ datacite:language >
  </ datacite:languages >
11. < datacite:relatedIdentifiers >
  1. < datacite:relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType =" URL " relationType =" IsSupplementTo " > 2660-4515 </ datacite:relatedIdentifier >
  2. < datacite:relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType =" DOI " relationType =" IsSupplementTo " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ datacite:relatedIdentifier >
  3. < datacite:relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType =" URL " relationType =" IsSupplementTo " > 2604-6202 </ datacite:relatedIdentifier >
  </ datacite:relatedIdentifiers >
12. < datacite:rightsList >
  1. < datacite:rights > Attribution 4.0 International </ datacite:rights >
  2. < datacite:rights rightsURI =" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ " > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ </ datacite:rights >
  3. < datacite:rights rightsURI =" info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess " > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ datacite:rights >
  </ datacite:rightsList >
13. < datacite:formats >
  1. < datacite:format > application/pdf </ datacite:format >
  </ datacite:formats >
14. < datacite:publisher > Universitat de Girona Marcial Pons </ datacite:publisher >
</ datacite:resource >

ore

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< atom:entry schemaLocation =" http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom http://www.kbcafe.com/rss/atom.xsd.xml " >
1. < atom:id > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400/ore.xml </ atom:id >
2. < atom:link href =" http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 " rel =" alternate " />
3. < atom:link href =" http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400/ore.xml " rel =" http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/describes " />
4. < atom:link href =" http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400/ore.xml#atom " rel =" self " type =" application/atom+xml " />
5. < atom:published > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ atom:published >
6. < atom:updated > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ atom:updated >
7. < atom:source >
  1. < atom:generator > DUGiDocs </ atom:generator >
  </ atom:source >
8. < atom:title > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ atom:title >
9. < atom:author >
  1. < atom:name > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ atom:name >
  </ atom:author >
10. < atom:category label =" Aggregation " scheme =" http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/ " term =" http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/Aggregation " />
11. < atom:category scheme =" http://www.openarchives.org/ore/atom/modified " term =" 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z " />
12. < atom:category label =" DSpace Item " scheme =" http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/ " term =" DSpaceItem " />
13. < atom:link href =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/1/Gonzales+Rose_QF+7_2024.pdf " length =" 621940 " rel =" http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/aggregates " title =" Gonzales Rose_QF 7_2024.pdf " type =" application/pdf " />
14. < oreatom:triples >
  1. < rdf:Description about =" http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400/ore.xml#atom " >
    1. < rdf:type resource =" http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceItem " />
    2. < dcterms:modified > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ dcterms:modified >
    </ rdf:Description >
  2. < rdf:Description about =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/3/license.txt " >
    1. < rdf:type resource =" http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceBitstream " />
    2. < dcterms:description > LICENSE </ dcterms:description >
    </ rdf:Description >
  3. < rdf:Description about =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/2/license_rdf " >
    1. < rdf:type resource =" http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceBitstream " />
    2. < dcterms:description > CC-LICENSE </ dcterms:description >
    </ rdf:Description >
  4. < rdf:Description about =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/1/Gonzales+Rose_QF+7_2024.pdf " >
    1. < rdf:type resource =" http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceBitstream " />
    2. < dcterms:description > ORIGINAL </ dcterms:description >
    </ rdf:Description >
  </ oreatom:triples >
</ atom:entry >

qdc

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< qdc:qualifieddc schemaLocation =" http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd " >
1. < dc:title > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ dc:title >
2. < dc:creator > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ dc:creator >
3. < dc:subject > Justícia </ dc:subject >
4. < dc:subject > Justice </ dc:subject >
5. < dc:subject > Procediment judicial </ dc:subject >
6. < dc:subject > Judicial process </ dc:subject >
7. < dc:subject > Procediment penal </ dc:subject >
8. < dc:subject > Criminal procedure </ dc:subject >
9. < dc:subject > Equitat (Dret </ dc:subject >
10. < dc:subject > Equity </ dc:subject >
11. < dcterms:abstract > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ dcterms:abstract >
12. < dcterms:issued > 2024 </ dcterms:issued >
13. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
14. < dc:identifier > 2660-4515 </ dc:identifier >
15. < dc:identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ dc:identifier >
16. < dc:identifier > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ dc:identifier >
17. < dc:identifier > 2604-6202 </ dc:identifier >
18. < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >
19. < dc:relation > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ dc:relation >
20. < dc:relation > QF, vol. 07 (2024), p. 173-185 </ dc:relation >
21. < dc:relation > QF, núm. 07 (2024) </ dc:relation >
22. < dc:rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ </ dc:rights >
23. < dc:rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dc:rights >
24. < dc:rights > Attribution 4.0 International </ dc:rights >
25. < dc:publisher > Universitat de Girona Marcial Pons </ dc:publisher >
26. < dc:descriptionOds > 10. Reducció de les desigualtats </ dc:descriptionOds >
27. < dc:descriptionOds > 10. Reduced Inequality </ dc:descriptionOds >
28. < dc:descriptionOds > 10. Reducción de las desigualdades </ dc:descriptionOds >
29. < dc:descriptionOds > 16. Pau, justícia i institucions sòlides </ dc:descriptionOds >
30. < dc:descriptionOds > 16. Peace and Justice Strong Institutions </ dc:descriptionOds >
31. < dc:descriptionOds > 16. Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas </ dc:descriptionOds >
</ qdc:qualifieddc >

rdf

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< rdf:RDF schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd " >
1. < ow:Publication about =" oai:dugi-doc.udg.edu:10256/26400 " >
  1. < dc:title > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ dc:title >
  2. < dc:creator > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ dc:creator >
  3. < dc:subject > Justícia </ dc:subject >
  4. < dc:subject > Justice </ dc:subject >
  5. < dc:subject > Procediment judicial </ dc:subject >
  6. < dc:subject > Judicial process </ dc:subject >
  7. < dc:subject > Procediment penal </ dc:subject >
  8. < dc:subject > Criminal procedure </ dc:subject >
  9. < dc:subject > Equitat (Dret </ dc:subject >
  10. < dc:subject > Equity </ dc:subject >
  11. < dc:description > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ dc:description >
  12. < dc:date > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ dc:date >
  13. < dc:date > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ dc:date >
  14. < dc:date > 2024 </ dc:date >
  15. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
  16. < dc:identifier > 2660-4515 </ dc:identifier >
  17. < dc:identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ dc:identifier >
  18. < dc:identifier > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ dc:identifier >
  19. < dc:identifier > 2604-6202 </ dc:identifier >
  20. < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >
  21. < dc:relation > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ dc:relation >
  22. < dc:relation > QF, vol. 07 (2024), p. 173-185 </ dc:relation >
  23. < dc:relation > QF, núm. 07 (2024) </ dc:relation >
  24. < dc:rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ </ dc:rights >
  25. < dc:rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dc:rights >
  26. < dc:rights > Attribution 4.0 International </ dc:rights >
  27. < dc:publisher > Universitat de Girona Marcial Pons </ dc:publisher >
  </ ow:Publication >
</ rdf:RDF >

xoai

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< metadata schemaLocation =" http://www.lyncode.com/xoai http://www.lyncode.com/xsd/xoai.xsd " >
1. < element name =" dc " >
  1. < element name =" contributor " >
    1. < element name =" author " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > Gonzales Rose, Jasmine B. </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  2. < element name =" date " >
    1. < element name =" accessioned " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" available " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" issued " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 2024 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  3. < element name =" identifier " >
    1. < element name =" issn " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 2660-4515 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" uri " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26400 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" doi " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    4. < element name =" eissn " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 2604-6202 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  4. < element name =" description " >
    1. < element name =" abstract " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > This paper offers a critical race theory perspective on the testimonial injustice experienced by racially minoritized criminal defendants in evidential practice. It builds off Federico Picinali’s paper, inter alia, substantiating how minoritized criminal defendants experience testimonial harm through credibility deficit, by exploring epistemic injustice to the same when prosecutorial witnesses receive identity-based credibility excess. It argues that in an adversarial criminal legal system, the testimonial injustice of credibility excess afforded racial in-group prosecutorial witnesses should be considered in tandem with the testimonial injustice of credibility deficit imposed on racial out-group defendants. Only then can the epistemic harm and resultant unfairness at trial for defendants be fully assessed. The paper advocates for expanding the definition of testimonial injustice to en-compass the epistemic wrong of socially biased credibility excess and «transferred epistemic harm». In instances of transferred epistemic harm, the harm inflicted by an epistemic wrong impacts the speaker’s interlocutor rather (or more) than the speaker themselves </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" provenance " >
      1. < element name =" en " >
        
        < field name =" value " > Submitted by Alfredo Cobo (fredy.cobo@udg.edu) on 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 908 bytes, checksum: 0175ea4a2d4caec4bbcc37e300941108 (MD5) Gonzales Rose_QF 7_2024.pdf: 621940 bytes, checksum: 996e7c520aee9f542f85b5fdff1d518c (MD5) </ field >
        
        < field name =" value " > Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-13T11:02:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 908 bytes, checksum: 0175ea4a2d4caec4bbcc37e300941108 (MD5) Gonzales Rose_QF 7_2024.pdf: 621940 bytes, checksum: 996e7c520aee9f542f85b5fdff1d518c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2024 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" ods " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 10 </ field >
        
        < field name =" value " > 16 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  5. < element name =" format " >
    1. < element name =" mimetype " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > application/pdf </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  6. < element name =" language " >
    1. < element name =" iso " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > eng </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  7. < element name =" publisher " >
    1. < element name =" cat " >
      1. < field name =" value " > Universitat de Girona Marcial Pons </ field >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  8. < element name =" relation " >
    1. < element name =" isformatof " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i7.23043 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" ispartof " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > QF, vol. 07 (2024), p. 173-185 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" ispartofseries " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > QF, núm. 07 (2024) </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  9. < element name =" rights " >
    1. < element name =" * " >
      1. < field name =" value " > Attribution 4.0 International </ field >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" uri " >
      1. < element name =" * " >
        
        < field name =" value " > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" accessRights " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  10. < element name =" subject " >
    1. < element name =" cat " >
      1. < field name =" value " > Justícia </ field >
      2. < field name =" value " > Justice </ field >
      3. < field name =" value " > Procediment judicial </ field >
      4. < field name =" value " > Judicial process </ field >
      5. < field name =" value " > Procediment penal </ field >
      6. < field name =" value " > Criminal procedure </ field >
      7. < field name =" value " > Equitat (Dret </ field >
      8. < field name =" value " > Equity </ field >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  11. < element name =" title " >
    1. < element name =" cat " >
      1. < field name =" value " > A critical perspective on testimonial injustice: interrogating witnesses credibility excess in criminal trials: a comment on Federico Picinali's «evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial» </ field >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  12. < element name =" type " >
    1. < element name =" cat " >
      1. < field name =" value " > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ field >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" version " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" peerreviewed " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > peer-reviewed </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  </ element >
2. < element name =" adm " >
  1. < element name =" sets " >
    1. < element name =" hidden " >
      1. < element name =" cat " >
        
        < field name =" value " > NO </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  </ element >
3. < element name =" bundles " >
  1. < element name =" bundle " >
    1. < field name =" name " > LICENSE </ field >
    2. < element name =" bitstreams " >
      1. < element name =" bitstream " >
        
        < field name =" name " > license.txt </ field >
        
        < field name =" originalName " > license.txt </ field >
        
        < field name =" format " > text/plain </ field >
        
        < field name =" size " > 1748 </ field >
        
        < field name =" url " > https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/3/license.txt </ field >
        
        < field name =" checksum " > 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 </ field >
        
        < field name =" checksumAlgorithm " > MD5 </ field >
        
        < field name =" sid " > 3 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  2. < element name =" bundle " >
    1. < field name =" name " > CC-LICENSE </ field >
    2. < element name =" bitstreams " >
      1. < element name =" bitstream " >
        
        < field name =" name " > license_rdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" originalName " > license_rdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" format " > application/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8 </ field >
        
        < field name =" size " > 908 </ field >
        
        < field name =" url " > https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/2/license_rdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" checksum " > 0175ea4a2d4caec4bbcc37e300941108 </ field >
        
        < field name =" checksumAlgorithm " > MD5 </ field >
        
        < field name =" sid " > 2 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  3. < element name =" bundle " >
    1. < field name =" name " > ORIGINAL </ field >
    2. < element name =" bitstreams " >
      1. < element name =" bitstream " >
        
        < field name =" name " > Gonzales Rose_QF 7_2024.pdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" originalName " > Gonzales Rose_QF 7_2024.pdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" description " />
        
        < field name =" format " > application/pdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" size " > 621940 </ field >
        
        < field name =" url " > https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/26400/1/Gonzales+Rose_QF+7_2024.pdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" checksum " > 996e7c520aee9f542f85b5fdff1d518c </ field >
        
        < field name =" checksumAlgorithm " > MD5 </ field >
        
        < field name =" sid " > 1 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  </ element >
4. < element name =" others " >
  1. < field name =" handle " > 10256/26400 </ field >
  2. < field name =" identifier " > oai:dugi-doc.udg.edu:10256/26400 </ field >
  3. < field name =" lastModifyDate " > 2025-02-13 12:02:54.331 </ field >
  </ element >
5. < element name =" repository " >
  1. < field name =" name " > DUGiDocs </ field >
  2. < field name =" mail " > oriol.olive@udg.edu </ field >
  </ element >
6. < element name =" license " >
  1. < field name =" bin " > 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 </ field >
  </ element >
</ metadata >

Biblioteca de Catalunya Carrer de l'Hospital, 56. 08001 Barcelona Email: catalonica@bnc.cat Tlf.: +34 932 702 300

OAI Repository