Catalònica: Aggregator of digital content of Catalunya

It's in  › Log data

A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française

Resource identifiers

http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268

Origin

(DUGiDocs. Publicacions)

File

Title:: A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française
Description:: In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac
Origin:: Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2021, núm.2, p. 29-52; QF, vol. 02 (2021)
Idioma:: English
Relationship:: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2660-4515; info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2604-6202
Author/Producer:: Leclerc, Olivier
Editor:: Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica; Marcial Pons
Rights:: Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Date:: 2021-01-13
Resource type:: info:eu-repo/semantics/article; info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion; peer-reviewed
Format:: application/pdf

oai_dc

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< oai_dc:dc schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd " >
1. < dc:title > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ dc:title >
2. < dc:creator > Leclerc, Olivier </ dc:creator >
3. < dc:description > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ dc:description >
4. < dc:date > 2021-01-13 </ dc:date >
5. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
6. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ dc:type >
7. < dc:type > peer-reviewed </ dc:type >
8. < dc:identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ dc:identifier >
9. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ dc:relation >
10. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2660-4515 </ dc:relation >
11. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2604-6202 </ dc:relation >
12. < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >
13. < dc:source > Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2021, núm.2, p. 29-52 </ dc:source >
14. < dc:source > QF, vol. 02 (2021) </ dc:source >
15. < dc:rights > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ dc:rights >
16. < dc:rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 </ dc:rights >
17. < dc:rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dc:rights >
18. < dc:format > application/pdf </ dc:format >
19. < dc:publisher > Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica </ dc:publisher >
20. < dc:publisher > Marcial Pons </ dc:publisher >
</ oai_dc:dc >

didl

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< d:DIDL schemaLocation =" urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:02-DIDL-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/did/didl.xsd " >
1. < d:DIDLInfo >
  1. < dcterms:created schemaLocation =" http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/dcterms.xsd " > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ dcterms:created >
  </ d:DIDLInfo >
2. < d:Item id =" hdl_10256_19268 " >
  1. < d:Descriptor >
    1. < d:Statement mimeType =" application/xml; charset=utf-8 " >
      1. < dii:Identifier schemaLocation =" urn:mpeg:mpeg21:2002:01-DII-NS http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/MPEG-21_schema_files/dii/dii.xsd " > urn:hdl:10256/19268 </ dii:Identifier >
      </ d:Statement >
    </ d:Descriptor >
  2. < d:Descriptor >
    1. < d:Statement mimeType =" application/xml; charset=utf-8 " >
      1. < oai_dc:dc schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd " >
        
        < dc:title > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ dc:title >
        
        < dc:creator > Leclerc, Olivier </ dc:creator >
        
        < dc:description > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ dc:description >
        
        < dc:date > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ dc:date >
        
        < dc:date > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ dc:date >
        
        < dc:date > 2021-01-13 </ dc:date >
        
        < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
        
        < dc:identifier > 2660-4515 </ dc:identifier >
        
        < dc:identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ dc:identifier >
        
        < dc:identifier > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ dc:identifier >
        
        < dc:identifier > 2604-6202 </ dc:identifier >
        
        < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >
        
        < dc:relation > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ dc:relation >
        
        < dc:relation > Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2021, núm.2, p. 29-52 </ dc:relation >
        
        < dc:relation > QF, vol. 02 (2021) </ dc:relation >
        
        < dc:rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 </ dc:rights >
        
        < dc:rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dc:rights >
        
        < dc:rights > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ dc:rights >
        
        < dc:publisher > Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica </ dc:publisher >
        
        < dc:publisher > Marcial Pons </ dc:publisher >
        
        </ oai_dc:dc >
      </ d:Statement >
    </ d:Descriptor >
  3. < d:Component id =" 10256_19268_3 " >
    1. < d:Resource mimeType =" application/pdf " ref =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/19268/3/05ArticlePags29-52.pdf " />
    </ d:Component >
  </ d:Item >
</ d:DIDL >

dim

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< dim:dim schemaLocation =" http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd " >
1. < dim:field element =" contributor " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" author " > Leclerc, Olivier </ dim:field >
2. < dim:field element =" date " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" accessioned " > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ dim:field >
3. < dim:field element =" date " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" available " > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ dim:field >
4. < dim:field element =" date " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" issued " > 2021-01-13 </ dim:field >
5. < dim:field element =" identifier " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" issn " > 2660-4515 </ dim:field >
6. < dim:field element =" identifier " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" uri " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ dim:field >
7. < dim:field element =" identifier " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" doi " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ dim:field >
8. < dim:field element =" identifier " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" eissn " > 2604-6202 </ dim:field >
9. < dim:field element =" description " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" abstract " > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ dim:field >
10. < dim:field element =" description " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" provenance " > Submitted by Gestor del Dipòsit (ddocsadmin) on 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z No. of bitstreams: 1 04ArticlePags21-25.pdf: 60943 bytes, checksum: ce3895a2298bff119fbb25dc25d900fd (MD5) </ dim:field >
11. < dim:field element =" description " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" provenance " > Made available in DSpace on 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 04ArticlePags21-25.pdf: 60943 bytes, checksum: ce3895a2298bff119fbb25dc25d900fd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-07-01 </ dim:field >
12. < dim:field element =" format " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" mimetype " > application/pdf </ dim:field >
13. < dim:field element =" language " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" iso " > eng </ dim:field >
14. < dim:field element =" publisher " mdschema =" dc " > Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica </ dim:field >
15. < dim:field element =" publisher " mdschema =" dc " > Marcial Pons </ dim:field >
16. < dim:field element =" relation " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" isformatof " > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ dim:field >
17. < dim:field element =" relation " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" ispartof " > Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2021, núm.2, p. 29-52 </ dim:field >
18. < dim:field element =" relation " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" ispartofseries " > QF, vol. 02 (2021) </ dim:field >
19. < dim:field element =" rights " mdschema =" dc " > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ dim:field >
20. < dim:field element =" rights " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" uri " > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 </ dim:field >
21. < dim:field element =" rights " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" accessRights " > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dim:field >
22. < dim:field element =" title " mdschema =" dc " > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ dim:field >
23. < dim:field element =" type " mdschema =" dc " > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dim:field >
24. < dim:field element =" type " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" version " > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ dim:field >
25. < dim:field element =" type " mdschema =" dc " qualifier =" peerreviewed " > peer-reviewed </ dim:field >
</ dim:dim >

edm

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< rdf:RDF schemaLocation =" http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/EDM.xsd " >
1. < edm:ProvidedCHO about =" https://catalonica.bnc.cat/catalonicahub/lod/oai:dugi-doc.udg.edu:10256_--_19268#ent0 " >
  1. < dc:creator > Leclerc, Olivier </ dc:creator >
  2. < dc:date > 2021-01-13 </ dc:date >
  3. < dc:description > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ dc:description >
  4. < dc:identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ dc:identifier >
  5. < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >
  6. < dc:publisher > Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica </ dc:publisher >
  7. < dc:publisher > Marcial Pons </ dc:publisher >
  8. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ dc:relation >
  9. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2660-4515 </ dc:relation >
  10. < dc:relation > info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2604-6202 </ dc:relation >
  11. < dc:rights > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ dc:rights >
  12. < dc:rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 </ dc:rights >
  13. < dc:rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dc:rights >
  14. < dc:source > Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2021, núm.2, p. 29-52 </ dc:source >
  15. < dc:source > QF, vol. 02 (2021) </ dc:source >
  16. < dc:title > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ dc:title >
  17. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
  18. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ dc:type >
  19. < dc:type > peer-reviewed </ dc:type >
  20. < edm:type > TEXT </ edm:type >
  </ edm:ProvidedCHO >
2. < ore:Aggregation about =" https://catalonica.bnc.cat/catalonicahub/lod/oai:dugi-doc.udg.edu:10256_--_19268#ent1 " >
  1. < edm:aggregatedCHO resource =" https://catalonica.bnc.cat/catalonicahub/lod/oai:dugi-doc.udg.edu:10256_--_19268#ent0 " />
  2. < edm:dataProvider > DUGiDocs. Publicacions </ edm:dataProvider >
  3. < edm:isShownAt resource =" http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 " />
  4. < edm:isShownBy resource =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/19268/3/05ArticlePags29-52.pdf " />
  5. < edm:provider > Catalònica </ edm:provider >
  6. < edm:rights resource =" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 " />
  </ ore:Aggregation >
</ rdf:RDF >

etdms

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< thesis schemaLocation =" http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd " >
1. < title > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ title >
2. < creator > Leclerc, Olivier </ creator >
3. < description > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ description >
4. < date > 2021-03-04 </ date >
5. < date > 2021-03-04 </ date >
6. < date > 2021-01-13 </ date >
7. < type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ type >
8. < identifier > 2660-4515 </ identifier >
9. < identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ identifier >
10. < identifier > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ identifier >
11. < identifier > 2604-6202 </ identifier >
12. < language > eng </ language >
13. < relation > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ relation >
14. < relation > Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2021, núm.2, p. 29-52 </ relation >
15. < relation > QF, vol. 02 (2021) </ relation >
16. < rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 </ rights >
17. < rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ rights >
18. < rights > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ rights >
19. < publisher > Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica </ publisher >
20. < publisher > Marcial Pons </ publisher >
</ thesis >

marc

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< record schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd " >
1. < leader > 00925njm 22002777a 4500 </ leader >
2. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 042 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > dc </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
3. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Leclerc, Olivier </ subfield >
  2. < subfield code =" e " > author </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
4. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 260 " >
  1. < subfield code =" c " > 2021-01-13 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
5. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 520 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
6. < datafield ind1 =" 8 " ind2 =" " tag =" 024 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > 2660-4515 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
7. < datafield ind1 =" 8 " ind2 =" " tag =" 024 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
8. < datafield ind1 =" 8 " ind2 =" " tag =" 024 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
9. < datafield ind1 =" 8 " ind2 =" " tag =" 024 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > 2604-6202 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
10. < datafield ind1 =" 0 " ind2 =" 0 " tag =" 245 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
</ record >

mets

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< mets ID =" DSpace_ITEM_10256-19268 " OBJID =" hdl:10256/19268 " PROFILE =" DSpace METS SIP Profile 1.0 " TYPE =" DSpace ITEM " schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd " >
1. < metsHdr CREATEDATE =" 2024-06-07T04:15:56Z " >
  1. < agent ROLE =" CUSTODIAN " TYPE =" ORGANIZATION " >
    1. < name > DUGiDocs </ name >
    </ agent >
  </ metsHdr >
2. < dmdSec ID =" DMD_10256_19268 " >
  1. < mdWrap MDTYPE =" MODS " >
    1. < xmlData schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd " >
      1. < mods:mods schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd " >
        
        < mods:name >
        
        < mods:role >
        
        < mods:roleTerm type =" text " > author </ mods:roleTerm >
        
        </ mods:role >
        
        < mods:namePart > Leclerc, Olivier </ mods:namePart >
        
        </ mods:name >
        
        < mods:extension >
        
        < mods:dateAccessioned encoding =" iso8601 " > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ mods:dateAccessioned >
        
        </ mods:extension >
        
        < mods:extension >
        
        < mods:dateAvailable encoding =" iso8601 " > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ mods:dateAvailable >
        
        </ mods:extension >
        
        < mods:originInfo >
        
        < mods:dateIssued encoding =" iso8601 " > 2021-01-13 </ mods:dateIssued >
        
        </ mods:originInfo >
        
        < mods:identifier type =" issn " > 2660-4515 </ mods:identifier >
        
        < mods:identifier type =" uri " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ mods:identifier >
        
        < mods:identifier type =" doi " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ mods:identifier >
        
        < mods:identifier type =" eissn " > 2604-6202 </ mods:identifier >
        
        < mods:abstract > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ mods:abstract >
        
        < mods:language >
        
        < mods:languageTerm authority =" rfc3066 " > eng </ mods:languageTerm >
        
        </ mods:language >
        
        < mods:accessCondition type =" useAndReproduction " > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ mods:accessCondition >
        
        < mods:titleInfo >
        
        < mods:title > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ mods:title >
        
        </ mods:titleInfo >
        
        < mods:genre > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ mods:genre >
        
        </ mods:mods >
      </ xmlData >
    </ mdWrap >
  </ dmdSec >
3. < amdSec ID =" TMD_10256_19268 " >
  1. < rightsMD ID =" RIG_10256_19268 " >
    1. < mdWrap MDTYPE =" OTHER " MIMETYPE =" text/plain " OTHERMDTYPE =" DSpaceDepositLicense " >
      1. < binData > 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 </ binData >
      </ mdWrap >
    </ rightsMD >
  </ amdSec >
4. < amdSec ID =" FO_10256_19268_3 " >
  1. < techMD ID =" TECH_O_10256_19268_3 " >
    1. < mdWrap MDTYPE =" PREMIS " >
      1. < xmlData schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/PREMIS-v1-0.xsd " >
        
        < premis:premis >
        
        < premis:object >
        
        < premis:objectIdentifier >
        
        < premis:objectIdentifierType > URL </ premis:objectIdentifierType >
        
        < premis:objectIdentifierValue > https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/19268/3/05ArticlePags29-52.pdf </ premis:objectIdentifierValue >
        
        </ premis:objectIdentifier >
        
        < premis:objectCategory > File </ premis:objectCategory >
        
        < premis:objectCharacteristics >
        
        < premis:fixity >
        
        < premis:messageDigestAlgorithm > MD5 </ premis:messageDigestAlgorithm >
        
        < premis:messageDigest > db228d2f6b0f7e906134545d863f1206 </ premis:messageDigest >
        
        </ premis:fixity >
        
        < premis:size > 196299 </ premis:size >
        
        < premis:format >
        
        < premis:formatDesignation >
        
        < premis:formatName > application/pdf </ premis:formatName >
        
        </ premis:formatDesignation >
        
        </ premis:format >
        
        </ premis:objectCharacteristics >
        
        < premis:originalName > 05ArticlePags29-52.pdf </ premis:originalName >
        
        </ premis:object >
        
        </ premis:premis >
        
        </ xmlData >
      </ mdWrap >
    </ techMD >
  </ amdSec >
5. < fileSec >
  1. < fileGrp USE =" ORIGINAL " >
    1. < file ADMID =" FO_10256_19268_3 " CHECKSUM =" db228d2f6b0f7e906134545d863f1206 " CHECKSUMTYPE =" MD5 " GROUPID =" GROUP_BITSTREAM_10256_19268_3 " ID =" BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_10256_19268_3 " MIMETYPE =" application/pdf " SEQ =" 3 " SIZE =" 196299 " >
      1. < FLocat LOCTYPE =" URL " href =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/19268/3/05ArticlePags29-52.pdf " type =" simple " />
      </ file >
    </ fileGrp >
  </ fileSec >
6. < structMap LABEL =" DSpace Object " TYPE =" LOGICAL " >
  1. < div ADMID =" DMD_10256_19268 " TYPE =" DSpace Object Contents " >
    1. < div TYPE =" DSpace BITSTREAM " >
      1. < fptr FILEID =" BITSTREAM_ORIGINAL_10256_19268_3 " />
      </ div >
    </ div >
  </ structMap >
</ mets >

mods

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< mods:mods schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd " >
1. < mods:name >
  1. < mods:namePart > Leclerc, Olivier </ mods:namePart >
  </ mods:name >
2. < mods:extension >
  1. < mods:dateAvailable encoding =" iso8601 " > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ mods:dateAvailable >
  </ mods:extension >
3. < mods:extension >
  1. < mods:dateAccessioned encoding =" iso8601 " > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ mods:dateAccessioned >
  </ mods:extension >
4. < mods:originInfo >
  1. < mods:dateIssued encoding =" iso8601 " > 2021-01-13 </ mods:dateIssued >
  </ mods:originInfo >
5. < mods:identifier type =" issn " > 2660-4515 </ mods:identifier >
6. < mods:identifier type =" uri " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ mods:identifier >
7. < mods:identifier type =" doi " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ mods:identifier >
8. < mods:identifier type =" eissn " > 2604-6202 </ mods:identifier >
9. < mods:abstract > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ mods:abstract >
10. < mods:language >
  1. < mods:languageTerm > eng </ mods:languageTerm >
  </ mods:language >
11. < mods:accessCondition type =" useAndReproduction " > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 </ mods:accessCondition >
12. < mods:accessCondition type =" useAndReproduction " > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ mods:accessCondition >
13. < mods:accessCondition type =" useAndReproduction " > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ mods:accessCondition >
14. < mods:titleInfo >
  1. < mods:title > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ mods:title >
  </ mods:titleInfo >
15. < mods:genre > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ mods:genre >
</ mods:mods >

oai_datacite

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< datacite:resource schemaLocation =" http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4-2/metadata.xsd " >
1. < datacite:identifier identifierType =" Handle " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ datacite:identifier >
2. < datacite:titles >
  1. < datacite:title > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ datacite:title >
  </ datacite:titles >
3. < datacite:creators >
  1. < datacite:creator >
    1. < datacite:creatorName > Leclerc, Olivier </ datacite:creatorName >
    </ datacite:creator >
  </ datacite:creators >
4. < datacite:contributors />
5. < datacite:descriptions >
  1. < datacite:description descriptionType =" Abstract " > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ datacite:description >
  </ datacite:descriptions >
6. < datacite:dates >
  1. < datacite:date dateType =" Issued " > 2021-01-13 </ datacite:date >
  </ datacite:dates >
7. < datacite:publicationYear > 2021 </ datacite:publicationYear >
8. < datacite:resourceType resourceTypeGeneral =" Dataset " />
9. < datacite:languages >
  1. < datacite:language > eng </ datacite:language >
  </ datacite:languages >
10. < datacite:relatedIdentifiers >
  1. < datacite:relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType =" URL " relationType =" IsSupplementTo " > 2660-4515 </ datacite:relatedIdentifier >
  2. < datacite:relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType =" DOI " relationType =" IsSupplementTo " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ datacite:relatedIdentifier >
  3. < datacite:relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType =" URL " relationType =" IsSupplementTo " > 2604-6202 </ datacite:relatedIdentifier >
  </ datacite:relatedIdentifiers >
11. < datacite:rightsList >
  1. < datacite:rights > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ datacite:rights >
  2. < datacite:rights rightsURI =" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 " > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 </ datacite:rights >
  3. < datacite:rights rightsURI =" info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess " > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ datacite:rights >
  </ datacite:rightsList >
12. < datacite:formats >
  1. < datacite:format > application/pdf </ datacite:format >
  </ datacite:formats >
13. < datacite:publisher > Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica </ datacite:publisher >
14. < datacite:publisher > Marcial Pons </ datacite:publisher >
</ datacite:resource >

ore

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< atom:entry schemaLocation =" http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom http://www.kbcafe.com/rss/atom.xsd.xml " >
1. < atom:id > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268/ore.xml </ atom:id >
2. < atom:link href =" http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 " rel =" alternate " />
3. < atom:link href =" http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268/ore.xml " rel =" http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/describes " />
4. < atom:link href =" http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268/ore.xml#atom " rel =" self " type =" application/atom+xml " />
5. < atom:published > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ atom:published >
6. < atom:updated > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ atom:updated >
7. < atom:source >
  1. < atom:generator > DUGiDocs </ atom:generator >
  </ atom:source >
8. < atom:title > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ atom:title >
9. < atom:author >
  1. < atom:name > Leclerc, Olivier </ atom:name >
  </ atom:author >
10. < atom:category label =" Aggregation " scheme =" http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/ " term =" http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/Aggregation " />
11. < atom:category scheme =" http://www.openarchives.org/ore/atom/modified " term =" 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z " />
12. < atom:category label =" DSpace Item " scheme =" http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/ " term =" DSpaceItem " />
13. < atom:link href =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/19268/3/05ArticlePags29-52.pdf " length =" 196299 " rel =" http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/aggregates " title =" 05ArticlePags29-52.pdf " type =" application/pdf " />
14. < oreatom:triples >
  1. < rdf:Description about =" http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268/ore.xml#atom " >
    1. < rdf:type resource =" http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceItem " />
    2. < dcterms:modified > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ dcterms:modified >
    </ rdf:Description >
  2. < rdf:Description about =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/19268/3/05ArticlePags29-52.pdf " >
    1. < rdf:type resource =" http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceBitstream " />
    2. < dcterms:description > ORIGINAL </ dcterms:description >
    </ rdf:Description >
  3. < rdf:Description about =" https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/19268/2/license.txt " >
    1. < rdf:type resource =" http://www.dspace.org/objectModel/DSpaceBitstream " />
    2. < dcterms:description > LICENSE </ dcterms:description >
    </ rdf:Description >
  </ oreatom:triples >
</ atom:entry >

qdc

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< qdc:qualifieddc schemaLocation =" http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/terms/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd http://dspace.org/qualifieddc/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/xmlschema/qualifieddc.xsd " >
1. < dc:title > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ dc:title >
2. < dc:creator > Leclerc, Olivier </ dc:creator >
3. < dcterms:abstract > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ dcterms:abstract >
4. < dcterms:issued > 2021-01-13 </ dcterms:issued >
5. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
6. < dc:identifier > 2660-4515 </ dc:identifier >
7. < dc:identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ dc:identifier >
8. < dc:identifier > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ dc:identifier >
9. < dc:identifier > 2604-6202 </ dc:identifier >
10. < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >
11. < dc:relation > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ dc:relation >
12. < dc:relation > Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2021, núm.2, p. 29-52 </ dc:relation >
13. < dc:relation > QF, vol. 02 (2021) </ dc:relation >
14. < dc:rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 </ dc:rights >
15. < dc:rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dc:rights >
16. < dc:rights > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ dc:rights >
17. < dc:publisher > Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica </ dc:publisher >
18. < dc:publisher > Marcial Pons </ dc:publisher >
</ qdc:qualifieddc >

rdf

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< rdf:RDF schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd " >
1. < ow:Publication about =" oai:dugi-doc.udg.edu:10256/19268 " >
  1. < dc:title > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ dc:title >
  2. < dc:creator > Leclerc, Olivier </ dc:creator >
  3. < dc:description > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ dc:description >
  4. < dc:date > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ dc:date >
  5. < dc:date > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ dc:date >
  6. < dc:date > 2021-01-13 </ dc:date >
  7. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
  8. < dc:identifier > 2660-4515 </ dc:identifier >
  9. < dc:identifier > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ dc:identifier >
  10. < dc:identifier > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ dc:identifier >
  11. < dc:identifier > 2604-6202 </ dc:identifier >
  12. < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >
  13. < dc:relation > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ dc:relation >
  14. < dc:relation > Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2021, núm.2, p. 29-52 </ dc:relation >
  15. < dc:relation > QF, vol. 02 (2021) </ dc:relation >
  16. < dc:rights > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 </ dc:rights >
  17. < dc:rights > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ dc:rights >
  18. < dc:rights > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ dc:rights >
  19. < dc:publisher > Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica </ dc:publisher >
  20. < dc:publisher > Marcial Pons </ dc:publisher >
  </ ow:Publication >
</ rdf:RDF >

xoai

Download XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< metadata schemaLocation =" http://www.lyncode.com/xoai http://www.lyncode.com/xsd/xoai.xsd " >
1. < element name =" dc " >
  1. < element name =" contributor " >
    1. < element name =" author " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > Leclerc, Olivier </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  2. < element name =" date " >
    1. < element name =" accessioned " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" available " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" issued " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 2021-01-13 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  3. < element name =" identifier " >
    1. < element name =" issn " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 2660-4515 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" uri " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19268 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" doi " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    4. < element name =" eissn " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > 2604-6202 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  4. < element name =" description " >
    1. < element name =" abstract " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approac </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" provenance " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > Submitted by Gestor del Dipòsit (ddocsadmin) on 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z No. of bitstreams: 1 04ArticlePags21-25.pdf: 60943 bytes, checksum: ce3895a2298bff119fbb25dc25d900fd (MD5) </ field >
        
        < field name =" value " > Made available in DSpace on 2021-03-04T13:05:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 04ArticlePags21-25.pdf: 60943 bytes, checksum: ce3895a2298bff119fbb25dc25d900fd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-07-01 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  5. < element name =" format " >
    1. < element name =" mimetype " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > application/pdf </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  6. < element name =" language " >
    1. < element name =" iso " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > eng </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  7. < element name =" publisher " >
    1. < element name =" none " >
      1. < field name =" value " > Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica </ field >
      2. < field name =" value " > Marcial Pons </ field >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  8. < element name =" relation " >
    1. < element name =" isformatof " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" ispartof " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2021, núm.2, p. 29-52 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" ispartofseries " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > QF, vol. 02 (2021) </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  9. < element name =" rights " >
    1. < element name =" none " >
      1. < field name =" value " > Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional </ field >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" uri " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" accessRights " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  10. < element name =" title " >
    1. < element name =" none " >
      1. < field name =" value " > A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française </ field >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  11. < element name =" type " >
    1. < element name =" none " >
      1. < field name =" value " > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ field >
      </ element >
    2. < element name =" version " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    3. < element name =" peerreviewed " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > peer-reviewed </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  </ element >
2. < element name =" adm " >
  1. < element name =" sets " >
    1. < element name =" hidden " >
      1. < element name =" none " >
        
        < field name =" value " > NO </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  </ element >
3. < element name =" bundles " >
  1. < element name =" bundle " >
    1. < field name =" name " > ORIGINAL </ field >
    2. < element name =" bitstreams " >
      1. < element name =" bitstream " >
        
        < field name =" name " > 05ArticlePags29-52.pdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" originalName " > 05ArticlePags29-52.pdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" description " />
        
        < field name =" format " > application/pdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" size " > 196299 </ field >
        
        < field name =" url " > https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/19268/3/05ArticlePags29-52.pdf </ field >
        
        < field name =" checksum " > db228d2f6b0f7e906134545d863f1206 </ field >
        
        < field name =" checksumAlgorithm " > MD5 </ field >
        
        < field name =" sid " > 3 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  2. < element name =" bundle " >
    1. < field name =" name " > LICENSE </ field >
    2. < element name =" bitstreams " >
      1. < element name =" bitstream " >
        
        < field name =" name " > license.txt </ field >
        
        < field name =" originalName " > license.txt </ field >
        
        < field name =" format " > text/plain </ field >
        
        < field name =" size " > 1748 </ field >
        
        < field name =" url " > https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/bitstream/10256/19268/2/license.txt </ field >
        
        < field name =" checksum " > 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 </ field >
        
        < field name =" checksumAlgorithm " > MD5 </ field >
        
        < field name =" sid " > 2 </ field >
        
        </ element >
      </ element >
    </ element >
  </ element >
4. < element name =" others " >
  1. < field name =" handle " > 10256/19268 </ field >
  2. < field name =" identifier " > oai:dugi-doc.udg.edu:10256/19268 </ field >
  3. < field name =" lastModifyDate " > 2024-02-27 13:07:19.63 </ field >
  </ element >
5. < element name =" repository " >
  1. < field name =" name " > DUGiDocs </ field >
  2. < field name =" mail " > oriol.olive@udg.edu </ field >
  </ element >
6. < element name =" license " >
  1. < field name =" bin " > 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 </ field >
  </ element >
</ metadata >

Biblioteca de Catalunya Carrer de l'Hospital, 56. 08001 Barcelona Email: catalonica@bnc.cat Tlf.: +34 932 702 300

OAI Repository